T. SUPPLIE

Complete dentures, partial bridge on implants

Details
Published on 06 August 2011
Written by Thierry SUPPLIE
Hits: 455
JLIB_HTML_PAGE_CURRENT_OF_TOTAL


bibliographie


1 Adell R, Lekholm U, Brânemark Pl. Surgical procedures. In : Brânemark PI, Zarb HA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-lntegrated Prostheses. Osseointe- gration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago : Quintessen­ce Publishing Co., Inc., 1985:223-225. (Trad, fran­çaise de J. Bunni et F. Renouard. Prothèses ostéointégrées. L'ostéointégration en dentisterie cli­nique. Paris : Éditions CdP, 1989.)

  1. Beumer J, Lewis SG. The Brânemark Implant System : Clinical and Laboratory Procedures. St Louis- Tokyo : Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, Inc., 1989. (Trad, fran­çaise de X. Assémat-Tessandier. La prothèse sur im­plants de Brânemark. Protocole clinique ettechnique de laboratoire. Paris : Éditions CdP, 1991.)
  2. Hobo S, Ichida E, Garcia LT. Osseointegration and occlusal rehabilitation. Tokyo : Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., 1989.
  3. Parel SM, Balshi TJ, Sullivan DY. Modifications of existing prosthesis with osseointeg rated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:61 -65.
  4. Assémat-Tessandier X, Amzalag G, Irurzun JP. Complications prothétiques sur fixtures de Brâ­nemark. Réalités Cliniques 1992;3:345-357.
  5. Blatz MB, Hürzeler MB, Hildebrand D, Strub JR. Instrumente, materialien und gerate (MTI) ; Im­plantatsysteme und ihre komponenten. Implanto- logie 1996;4:357-360.
  6. Petrungaro PS. Fixed temporization and bone- augmented ridge stabilization with transitional im­plants. The implant report PP&A 1997;9:1071 -1078.
  7. Livatidis G. Les restaurations coulées à liaison résine : étude clinique. Rev Int Paro Dent Rest 1981 ; 1:70-79.
  8. Morin F, Valentín CM. Le collage en prothèse conjointe. Inf Dent 1983;65:2455-2461.
  9. Assémat-Tessandier X. La restauration des édentements postérieurs encastrés par la prothè­se conjointe collée. Inf Dent 1983;65:2467-2472.
  10. Simonsen R, Thompson V, Barrack G. Res­taurations collées : techniques cliniques et de la­boratoire. Paris : Éditions CdP, 1984.
  11. Barrack G. Restaurations coulées mordancées. Odontología 1985;6:91-98.
  12. Rouffignac M de, Cooman J de. Prototype d'un bridge collé à insertion horizontale. Actualités Odonto-Stomatol 1984; 147:551 -555.
  13. Samama Y, Ollier J, Millière N. Les intermé­diaires de bridges amovibles : une solution de choix en prothèse collée. Cah Prothèse 1986;54:101-114.


SUMMARY Provisional prosthesis in implant treatment
The implant treatment, whatever the chosen implant is, implies an important delay between the loss of the natural tooth and the installing of implant-borne prosthesis. In the meantime, the provisional rehabilitation of the tooth missing can be done through: - a partial denture, which is a conceivable solution in all cases but which necessitates an important post-surgical maintenance and numerous prosthetic operations; - a fixed prosthesis, on natural pillars or on provisional implants, which is the most rational solution for a patient wishing a fixed implant-borne prosthesis but it is not always possible. Lastly, we must not neglect cases where the patient can think about not restoring the missing teeth, which makes tremendously easier the post-surgery follow-up, without harming the prognosis of the treatment.
Keywords bonded provisional bridge, implants, provisional fixed prosthesis, provisional partial prosthesis, transitional implants.

You are here: Accueil work-in-implants temporary prosthesis implant treatment